- Bruce Fenton, a Bitcoin-advocate, has introduced his candidacy for the United States Senate in New Hampshire.
- Fenton was a earlier director of the Bitcoin Foundation and moved to New Hampshire in pursuit of the Free State Project, a political pro-freedom motion.
- “Democracy is a poor and overhyped system that results in two wolves and a sheep deciding what is for dinner,” Fenton says.
Bruce Fenton, a Bitcoin-advocate, has introduced his candidacy for the United States Senate to signify the state of New Hampshire. Bitcoin Magazine bought an unique interview with Bruce to focus on his ideas on Bitcoin and his goals on operating for the U.S. senate.
Bruce Fenton beforehand served as an govt director for the non-profit Bitcoin Foundation, initially based in 2012 with the intention of setting the ship proper with bitcoin as scandalous misrepresentation affected its repute. His early bitcoin-roots allowed Fenton to amass a small fortune making ready him for his eventual self-funded marketing campaign pushed by his $5 million injection.
After his tenure with the Bitcoin Foundation, Fenton turned his eyes to New Hampshire and the Free State Project, which is a political pro-freedom motion that requires smaller authorities and lax regulatory burdens. This specific group has been extensively accepting of bitcoin and no-doubt has served as a muse for Fenton’s festering discontent with the established order. A resistance for conventional programs appears staple to Bitcoiner ideology, which leads to cross emotions relating to the intersection of Bitcoin and politics as some need it to keep apolitical. This was one of many first factors Fenton made.
“Bitcoin is not apolitical. Bitcoin is political and has been since its inception,” Fenton said. “Satoshi understood liberty, freedom and the problems with the existing fiat system.”
Fenton continued to say “Some people say Bitcoin isn’t political out of fear of upsetting the other side. Fact is, separating money and state is just as political as separation of church and state was hundreds of years ago.”
Fenton went on to focus on how Bitcoin can fully change the way in which cash works and the disruptive nature inherent to the protocol. In discussing the methods bitcoin represents the change of archaic programs, Fenton stated:
“Bitcoin is voluntary and needs no central point of control to make it work. Bitcoin uses technology to create the next natural evolution in money and how we move value in the world. More broadly, Bitcoin is part of the massive change we are seeing in the world, a change from centralized power to decentralized power.”
Speaking of change, it is essential to listen to the adjustments being pursued by all candidates, not simply Fenton. However, Bitcoin Magazine did ask what, particular to bitcoin, would Fenton push ahead? He gave a succinct reply.
“I’d like to have the government entirely uninvolved with Bitcoin.”
That would appear an apparent reply to Bitcoiners, as a result of it is. However, there are nonetheless different politicians for and towards Bitcoin. This begs the query of what Bitcoiners ought to demand from politicians, however furthermore, what ought to they demand from Fenton?
“Bitcoiners should demand the simple right to run, use and write code they want. The government has no place in Bitcoin,” he stated. “I believe Bitcoin is one of the most important innovations in history for peace and human progress. Bitcoiners can demand and expect that I’ll be true to the core principles of this technology and movement.”
To shut out the interview, Bitcoin Magazine requested Fenton a easy, but advanced query, and it’s one we’ve got all actually wrestled with sooner or later — is democracy vital for freedom?
“Democracy is a poor and overhyped system that results in two wolves and a sheep deciding what is for dinner,” Fenton declared. We can’t obtain freedom with democracy and the founders knew this, which is why they selected a constitutional republic as an alternative.”
Fenton went on to clarify there turns into a bigger difficulty at hand with the democratically elected officers of a constitutional republic opting not to observe their constitutional origins. He then supplied his ideally suited answer for the system.
“The best way to achieve the maximum peace and freedom is to allow voluntary human choice and to avoid force and violence in every way possible.”
